Jump to content

Welcome to NikonForums.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Scott_G

Scott_G

Member Since 30 Jun 2015
Offline Last Active Oct 30 2015 04:57 PM
-----

Sweden 2015

30 October 2015 - 04:36 PM

A few pix from my trip to Sweden in September of this year.  I bought a Tamron 16-300 for the trip so I wouldn't need to carry around, or switch between, multiple lenses.  Everything was shot off hand, although I did have a handstrap.  As far as a general purpose, day to day traveling lens, I'm very happy with it.

 

Attached File  DSC_1435-Pano.jpg   202.14KB   94 downloads

Looking towards Uppsala from atop a burial mound in Old Uppsala.

 

 

Attached File  DSC_1621.jpg   73.51KB   92 downloads

Relaxing on a spit of land out in Lake Vannern near Karlstad.

 

 

Attached File  gothenberg_pano.jpg   118.2KB   90 downloads

Up the river into Gothenberg from atop the "Lipstick Tower."

 

 

Attached File  white_boat.jpg   306.26KB   97 downloads

White boat - shot during a boat tour of Gothenberg.


Monopod comparison

18 July 2015 - 01:02 PM

When you start spending money, you might as well get a whole bunch of stuff.  In addition to my new camera and lens, I ordered a couple monopods.  One has pop-out feet and a ball head, but I have the feeling I'm going to prefer the taller, less expensive one with just an adjustable quick change plate and a fold-down foot support.

 

Once I get them, maybe I'll post a semi-scientific comparison.

 

My fallback is a piece of twine connected to a bolt that screws into the tripod connection on the bottom of the camera.  Easier to carry, anyway.


Tamron 16-300: Opinions?

12 July 2015 - 03:17 PM

I'm considering purchasing a D7100.  I was (still am) considering a couple other lenses to go with it, but then I saw the Tamron 16-300.  I have a Tamron 70-300 for my current camera (Pentax K30) and I like the quality I get with it.

 

Not being cheap, but rather practical, I was thinking of just getting the 16-300 instead.  I'm interested in hearing the opinion of folks who have the lens.  I'm not entirely stupid.  I know that "all-in-one" lenses have trade-offs and drawbacks.  My needs will be shots for work (PR type shots of folks and products) on a daily basis, and then more artistic-type shots whenever I get the chance to go out and shoot.  Plus, making another international trip with camera equipment, and I thought having just one lens would be easier than a whole case, which is what I did last time.

 

Is it reasonably sharp at both ends?  Is it "fast enough" for a wide range of shots?  How well does it handle night shots?  Any comments, positive or negative, will be greatly appreciated.  Thanks!

 

Very best,

 

Scott G.


Hello from Syracuse, NY

30 June 2015 - 03:59 PM

Hi everyone.  I'm Scott, from near Syracuse NY.  I have another brand of DSLR, and I use it to shoot mostly boring PR business photos.  I really want to get into doing more artistic stuff as well, and I've been considering the D7100 plus a couple lenses.  I'm no newcomer to photography, but I have a LOT to learn.  I'm most interested in landscapes and portraiture.

 

If anyone want to just say "Hi," or if they have comments/recommendations on gear and such, I'm happy to hear from you!

 

Very best,

 

Scott G.