Jump to content

Welcome to NikonForums.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Thumper

Thumper

Member Since 01 Oct 2013
Offline Last Active Sep 13 2019 10:53 AM
*****

#42358 You philosophy on post-processing: How much, how little, why?

Posted by Thumper on 25 September 2016 - 02:35 PM

I'd say do whatever you are comfortable with.  If you do photography as a hobby, then you are not out to please/satisfy anyone but yourself.  At least initially.   If you aren't comfortable with a certain level of editing, then don't do it.  When you look at your own work, you should be happy with it and comfortable with how you got it to where it is.  If you are happy with your results, then someone else coming up to you, looking at your work, and saying "It's undercooked" or "It's overcooked" should be regarded as someone else's opinion and not change how you feel about your work.  Even if it is someone whose opinion that you value.  It is all a matter of taste.  Just like with food.  Some people like certain kinds of food and are picky, other people like all kinds of food and appreciate the variety.  

 

Me personally, I do it all.  I'll barely edit some things, and other things will get outright butchered because I go so far overboard.  Since I am not doing this for a living and I don't have to answer to an employer or customers about how my photography looks, I have the luxury of being completely free with how I do my photography.  If I produce something that pleases me, I'll share it.  Some people may like it, and some people probably won't.  And that is great with me.  I started photography with film, at one point, I was processing my own film and prints in a wetlab darkroom.  But if you think that people weren't editing their work in a darkroom, sometimes heavily, then you'd be mistaken.  Especially with color photography.  I mainly did B&W on film, so most of my experience is there, and we did learn a lot of editing techniques in the wetlab darkroom.  I enjoyed color as well, but it was more involved (and expensive) compared to processing B&W.  With the advent of digital photography in the commercial and consumer markets, film has all but fallen in popularity.  Digital is much more convenient on many levels, and it is arguably cheaper to maintain.    (We could go into a really involved discussion on the two formats, which has probably been done to death over the years on many venues).  But with all of the different software platforms and applications available now, The ease and possibilities of processing and editing digital photographs is amazing.   

 

It's funny about the mindsets that we hold ourselves to with things like this.  In editing, I really don't hold myself to any rules, and I don't really adhere to anyone else's rules or comply with what other people think that I should be doing it in regards to my photography.  It is my photography, and I will do it as I please.  When I desire constructive criticism, I ask for it.  (Which is different than adhering to any sort of "rules".  I do try to be ever the student).  On my things, I don't do a huge amount of editing that takes the photo into a surreal appearance.  But sometimes, I do.   I depends on what I am looking for or looking to produce.  I love the technology.  But at the same time, I don't use a ton of the automated features on my camera.  I set my aperture, shutter speed, and ISO manually in almost every single shot.  I rarely use the program modes.  I use the autofocus most of the time (unless I am doing a focus stack or stitched panoramic or HDR sort of thing).  I use auto-white balance too, at least, most of the time, and at the camera level.  I will say that with the autofocus, there is the possibility of a lot going on there, depending on what I am shooting and in what mode.  (Action shots, etc).   But I do shoot most of my stuff in "Manual" mode, setting the aperture, ISO, and shutter speed myself.  Now, does that mean that I think that others that do use the program features of their cameras are "cheating" and not doing the photography themselves?  Of course not!  I could care less how other people produce their work.  All I want to see is their product.  I don't care how they got there (unless there is a particular technique/result that came up with that I would like to learn, and then I ask).  I love looking at peoples' photography.  I love seeing how other people capture moments in time and where they go with it and how they compose certain images and maybe take me somewhere or make me think.  I don't care how they got from A to B.  I just enjoy being there at the end and enjoying their work.  I apply that same mentality when I am holding  and using my own camera.  Once I embraced that freedom, it was like walking into a whole new world for me, and I enjoyed my photography so much more.  And in turn, I enjoyed other peoples' work even more.  

 

If you do have a desire to please other people with your work, just remember to make sure that you are happy with your work first.  Then share it.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Remember also to filter input/critique/criticism/reviews from the internet.  It's the internet, and trolls dwell there.  Trolls that enjoy nothing more than simply upsetting people and causing conflict where none exists.  This little community is one of the best photography communities that I have found. The folks here will be honest with you on critiques and constructive criticism if you ask them to.  I like that.  I like that a lot.  I expect brutal honesty if I ask for constructive criticism.  It's how we grow and how we learn.  But on the net, we have to filter the true critique of our peers from the maliciousness of the trolls.  




#42100 Nikon D4 - Crashing Cards

Posted by Thumper on 13 September 2016 - 10:51 PM

I do IT as a profession, and I will admit that I am excessively concerned about losing data, so I go to odd lengths to try to make sure that I don't lose any files.  I own several XQD cards and several CF cards.  When I buy them, I won't buy a lot at a time, even if they are on sale.  I will only buy 1 or 2 of each.  I have seen several manufacturers end up posting notices that a certain batch of their cards are known to have problems.  If I bought a bunch of cards at a time, and several of them fell into that faulty run, then I stand a greater chance of losing my data.  (Plus, XQD's are still cost prohibitive for me to purchase several at a time.  LOL).  If I have a card go bad, then I can swap to a different card immediately and not worry about it being a bad run of cards.  That eliminates the cards as a problem (or reduces the likelihood anyway), and if I am still getting errors, it is most likely the camera body causing it.  But when I start getting card errors, I tend to "overreact" a bit.  (Which is completely silly since I am only a hobbyist, and I don't rely on my photography for a living.  It is just the IT side of me that causes that, I guess). 

 

Camera cards are flash memory, and while more modern flash memory is really good and so much more reliable than in past years, it still can be a bit flakey at times, and all flash memory has a Write Life, that is, it can only be written to so many times before it becomes unusable.  Once it reaches that point, it can cause partial read errors, or it can crater the entire contents of the drive. And regardless of how well a card may be rated, they are all man made, so they can go bad right out of the package, even with the top brands (yes, even my precious and lovingly cared for Lexar's.  I had an XQD and a CF go bad right out of the packages, and back to back no less.  Swapped them out, and no problems since.  Neither would even show up on a computer, Mac or PC).  Sometimes, weird environmental factors can cause flash memory to "go bad".   Static is one of the worst things that can happen to computer parts, and it has inconsistent results/effects. *    You might also try a different battery for the body.   (Just to make sure that one of your batteries is not faulty and causing power inconsistencies that can cause write errors and ruin your flash memory). 

 

I would recommend trying a brand new, fresh out of the package XQD card and a CF card, then just hammer them with photos.   Not anything important that you couldn't afford to lose, but just stuff to fill up the cards.  You might try "control" sets with settings that you determine before hand to see if maybe there is something in the camera settings that may be causing some sort of write error with the cards.  If you don't get any errors and the cards read and write fine in the camera as well as on a computer, I'd guess the fault probably fell to a couple of bad cards, and they could have gone bad in-camera.  If the errors start happening on brand new cards, I'd send the body in for service.  

 

I use my XQD's as my primary cards, and I use the CF's as the backups.  I was under the impression that the XQD's were supposed to be rated for faster writing, so I figured that they would function best as the primaries.  (I could be totally wrong on that.  It's happened before.  I've seen it, and my wife reminds me about it every chance she gets). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* I had a computer get fried by lightning once, but the kicker was that the computer wasn't plugged in.  To anything!!  The news alerted us to a severe thunderstorm headed our way (normal springtime weather where I live), so I went around the house unplugging things.  As I tend to overdo somethings, I completely unplugged my personal tower.  I mean, nothing was plugged into it. No keyboard/mouse, no power, no network cables, nothing.  It was just sitting there on my chair mat, totally disconnected from everything.  Lightning hit our house, and the motherboard and RAM both had to be replaced afterwards.  My wife's computer, which was still plugged into the network line, but not the power, was just fine.   Static is weird stuff.  (We also had to replace a digital alarm clock, and we had a stereo speaker that ended up with a weird, low hum after that). Not that any of that relates really at all to your camera problem, it just came to mind when I was thinking about how static can affect electronics.  




#41985 Member survery...

Posted by Thumper on 09 September 2016 - 01:08 PM

Still a solid D here (2 years later), and I don't see that ever changing (since I have no ambition to do photography for a living).  I did get paid to shoot a company BBQ/picnic this summer, but I don't consider that really "work".   




#41618 Mauna Loa Helicopter Trip

Posted by Thumper on 22 August 2016 - 07:48 AM

Wow, those are really, really nice.  Thanks for sharing those.

 

Hawaii has some of the freakiest and most beautiful scenery anywhere on Earth.  Just stunning.   I'm sure that I will revisit that gallery a few times just to keep taking it all in. 




#41521 Song Title Game

Posted by Thumper on 17 August 2016 - 10:09 AM

Back To Shalla Bal

 

Joe Satriani

 

 

(Another one of Joe's sci fi references that he does quite often.  This one is from the Silver Surfer comics.  Shalla Bal being Norrin Radd's lover back on his home planet of Zenn-La ( Norrin Radd was the Silver Surfer's idenitity prior to him becoming Galactus's herald, The Silver Surfer).   This song references the Silver Surfer's return to his former lover after being away adventuring for a long time).   Your useless trivia for the day.  :lol:




#41518 Nighttime in Fazana, Croatia

Posted by Thumper on 17 August 2016 - 09:04 AM

Fantastic shots!!  Those are really nice.  Well done. 




#41300 Roll call for the editing exercises

Posted by Thumper on 07 August 2016 - 06:46 PM

I'm in.   




#41201 August Music Challenge

Posted by Thumper on 03 August 2016 - 12:51 PM

It starts out similar to Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata.  (Only on the violin, not piano).   It is a nice piece. 




#41193 August Music Challenge

Posted by Thumper on 03 August 2016 - 10:17 AM

I think the challenge will be to avoid being overly influenced by the images he has used in his video

 

I will listen to it but not watch it to avoid that very thing.   
 




#41180 A walk in the city garden

Posted by Thumper on 03 August 2016 - 07:59 AM

I can see why he liked it.  Lovely place.  Thanks for sharing those.

 

 

In #3, is that a transportation canal? 




#41042 A railway journey

Posted by Thumper on 29 July 2016 - 02:02 PM

I really enjoy this set.   I have always been fascinated with passenger rail travel.  




#41032 July Music Challenge

Posted by Thumper on 29 July 2016 - 08:08 AM

Bah!!! The other day I finally, yeah right at the end of the month, had a clear vision of what I want for this challenge. But just not been able to set it up. I was listening to it and analysing the lyrics and have it clear in my head what this song is all about. 

I had the exact same problem last month. 




#41031 hello

Posted by Thumper on 29 July 2016 - 08:07 AM

Welcome to the Nikon Forums!!




#41030 Merry Meet from the Mitten!

Posted by Thumper on 29 July 2016 - 08:06 AM

Welcome to the Nikon Forums!




#40922 July Music Challenge

Posted by Thumper on 25 July 2016 - 05:37 PM

In the terms of the song's depiction of a man's descent into self destruction and the personification of the absolute strength of the descent (as well as the man's apparent helplessness to it), it brought to mind for me, at least for this challenge, the dauntless Madam Queen.  

 

MadameQueen1-M.jpg

 

Nikon D4

Nikon 10.5mm f/2.8mm fisheye

f/5

1/160s

ISO 200

 

An absolute workhorse of her day.  

MQMonument1-M.jpg