Jump to content

Welcome to NikonForums.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

70-200 question

lens 70-200

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1
Camera N00b

Camera N00b

    Member

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 37 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationOttawa Ontario

Hey guys so I am gonna be picking up a 70-200 in October ish time. I am thinking of either the 

 

Tamron 70-200mm 2.8 G2 or the Nikon 70-200 F4

 

I would be using it for portraits, my younger siblings outside and **concert photography** (**important**)

 

the f4 would be not letting in as much light BUT if the Tamron isn't sharp until f4+ then no point in the Tamron.

 

Which should I get?

 

I have a D7200 so it'll be more like 105-300



#2
ScottinPollock

ScottinPollock

    Forum Veteran

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 648 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationWest Slope Northern Sierra Nevada
Tamron G2 is quite good. Why not rent one for a weekend and see?

#3
Camera N00b

Camera N00b

    Member

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 37 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationOttawa Ontario

no store has any for rental for either.



#4
Jerry_

Jerry_

    Nikonian

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,528 posts
  • Country Flag
I haven't heard that the Tamron 70-200/2.8 G2 isn't sharp unless f4+ - but would take in consideration that
- autofocussing is done at max aperture (so 2.8 is an advantage)
- the G2 seems to have an improved VC over the G1, which I have and which has already given excellent results in low light.

Best would be to try out both lenses to check which one you prefer, but based on specifications only I would go for the Tamron.

#5
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,634 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

As you will have to use it in less than stellar light for concert photography, the f/2.8 trumps everything as the f/4 will make the AF hunt in some cases leading to missed shots.



#6
Camera N00b

Camera N00b

    Member

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 37 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationOttawa Ontario

yeah, I know the low light and f2.8 but I was just curious since no point in going for it if it isn't sharp until f4+ cause I know a lot of lenses like that lol



#7
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,634 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

Even if you have to stop down to f/3.5 or 4, you still have the advantage when it comes to focusing. You can seldom use f/2.8 anyway as the DOF is a bit too shallow. The Nikon f/4 is a good lens, but twice the amount of light for the AF to work with is a *very* significant difference. I haven't used the G2, but all I've read about it is positive.



#8
Camera N00b

Camera N00b

    Member

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 37 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationOttawa Ontario

Yeah, I get it. I'll probably go for it! 



#9
ScottinPollock

ScottinPollock

    Forum Veteran

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 648 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationWest Slope Northern Sierra Nevada
I bet you'll like it.

#10
dcbear78

dcbear78

    Forum Veteran

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 701 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationGladstone, Queensland

yeah, I know the low light and f2.8 but I was just curious since no point in going for it if it isn't sharp until f4+ cause I know a lot of lenses like that lol

 

The previous version is more than sharp enough at f2.8 so I can't how the improved G2 version wouldn't follow this trend.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: lens, 70-200