Welcome to NikonForums.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
AF-S NIKKOR 300mm F4E PF ED VR Lens - Sample Photos
Started by Adam, Jan 06 2015 03:24 PM
#1
Posted 06 January 2015 - 03:24 PM
From the Nikon web site:Introducing a thrilling new 300mm f/4 prime lens capable of changing the way pro and serious enthusiasts shoot. At just 147.5mm long and 755g—over 30% shorter and 1.5lbs lighter than its predecessor—the AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f/4E PF ED VR is the world's lightest 300mm full-frame AF lens. (As of January 5, 2015. Statement based on Nikon research.) The secret to its remarkable size? A Nikon-designed Phase Fresnel (PF) lens element, a first for the NIKKOR DSLR lens lineup. But handling isn't the only advantage; the PF element also performs brilliantly—achieve new levels of sharpness and clarity with virtually no chromatic aberration or ghosting. Whether you shoot fashion, portraits, nature, wildlife, sports, action or today's big stories, the AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f/4E PF ED VR will help you capture stunning views of the decisive moment.
Click here to view the lens
Click here to view the lens
- Daniel likes this
#2
Posted 07 January 2015 - 01:30 AM
My dream lens specs; small and lightweight.
Infact Pentax A*300 is smaller (I know it is not AF lens) but a little heavier.
I hope its results will be amazing.
I wish I'd afford to get one someday.
But it's silly not to include tripod collar for that price.
#3
Posted 07 January 2015 - 08:58 AM
I took a look at the info on the Nikon USA site. It is small enough and light enough that it doesn't really need a tripod ring. There is one available as an accessory if someone felt they needed it. My guess is that most folks wouldn't use it with tripod / monopod so they made it an option to keep the cost as low as possible...
#5
Posted 21 September 2015 - 12:25 PM
#6
Posted 16 October 2015 - 12:31 AM
Certainly don't need a tripod or monopod for this lightweight lens. Samples below:
Very nice images! May I ask, were these taken wide open?