21 replies to this topic

[Samyaza]

I think the real problem here is Nikon's history of artificially crippling their offerings so that they don't compete with more expensive cameras.  There was no reason to exclude a 1/8000 shutter, reduce the FPS, offer a crippling buffer size or offer a slow flash sync speed other than to protect sales of the D4s and the D810(If anything the D750 needs the 1/8000 shutter more than the D810).  This was supposed to be the new D700, but it's more like what the D610 should have been.  They certainly have the right to play this game, but they can't expect everyone to be happy about it.  

It's not a perfect camera, but for the money I think Nikon did a pretty good job and for the most part they hit the sweet spot for a lot of users.  

[Shanti]

As for the big file size,why not just shoot at 24MP instead of 36 if that's possible,then best of both worlds.I mean to know there is 36 when needed ,but for most work 16-24 is more than enough,and faster burst rate as well I imagine? I am on the fence about the D810/D750  or maybe 6D. Size is not important,though the 810 would handle the 150-600 much better it seems(my next lens).JUst afraid my Pentax K5II won't get much use if i go for it