Hello, I am new to the forum and new to the DSLR world. I recently purchased a D3200 with the 18-55 kit lens and bought the 55-200 kit lens to go with it until I learn to shoot better and can afford better glass. I tried out and returned a Nikon 35mm and 50mm 1.8. I liked the quality of the 2 lenses, but seemed to be having to backup too much at times with the 50 or having to move in closer with the 35 to get the shot I wanted. After doing many many hours of reading reviews, forums, comparisons, manufacturer sites, etc., I decided on a Sigma 17-50 2.8 ( for available / low light hobby and family shooting). I almost made the purchase, but am kind of weary due to all the variance in Sigma's quality control. I'm kind of bummed because it seemed like a good solution at a price I can afford, but I really don't want to deal with the headache and hassle of returning a "bad copy". And the worst part is I'm not even sure I would be able to tell a good copy from a bad one due to my inexperience. I looked at the Nikon and it is a bit too pricey. The Tamron is similarly priced to the Sigma, but doesn't have as good of reviews / comparisons to the Sigma or Nikon.
Any thoughts, suggestions, advice would be appreciated. And I'm sorry if this is posted in the wrong location. Thanks!