Jump to content

Welcome to NikonForums.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

The "Why-Tech".


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1
MJL

MJL

    Active Member

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 58 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationThe Canadian wet coast

Site Supporter

I am all in for The Impossible Project and Lomography still supporting films, but sometime when I look at some of their gadgetries, the word “Why-Tech” pops up in my mind.  Being a long time Polaroid user, I pick up a “Why-Tech” accessory for Nikon film camera from a Pro last year and would like to share with you why I think some “inventions” are Why-Tech.

 

The NPC ProPack is a modified Polaroid Instant Film Back that uses a fiber optic block to transmit the image from the film camera film plane onto an instant film.  There is a small pull tab that will move the film into another position to allow a second 35mm image to be made on the same sheet.  This is really handy for determining exposure & lighting ratio in flash photography before digital age, and was very popular with Medium Format users.  I have attached a few photos below to explain.

 

Well, the problem is – unlike the 6X6 counterpart, the film inside a 35mm film camera cannot be remove once it is loaded – so if you want to recheck exposure in the middle of a roll, tough luck.  Likewise, there is no blind slide to protect the unexposed instant film when the ProPack is removed from the 35mm camera.  Oouch…   Why have not they thought of this no-no?

Attached Thumbnails

  • Front-NPC.jpg
  • Back-NPC.jpg
  • Open.jpg
  • FP.jpg


#2
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,646 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

We had one permanently mounted to an old, battered F2 that we used to check overall lighting, balance between the light sources and shadows for product shots. Using it for proofs was never easy, because the Fuji filmpacks we used were about ISO 80 if I remember correctly. That "about" was the problem, they were never quite consistent and drifted in sensitivity as they aged. We tried to buy stock so that we were always at 6 months before expiry date.

Neither I, nor my boss felt any kind of loss when we got the first Leaf back for the Hasselblad and could scrap the proofing camera.



#3
MJL

MJL

    Active Member

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 58 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationThe Canadian wet coast

Site Supporter

Interesting.  The Fuji instant film must have improved because those I used for last couple years are very consistent around ISO 100.  I am very thankful that Fuji is still making color pack film for my Polaroid 110A & 600SE, although they are going to stop the B&W. :(



#4
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,646 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

I think I read something in the late nineties about Land's patents running out, perhaps Fuji did something to improve their chemistry then?

/Peter