Jump to content

Welcome to NikonForums.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Camera and lens advice


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1
slsl6

slsl6

    New Member

  • Forum Member
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • Country Flag

I'm thinking of buying a z50 with the 16-50 and 50-250 kit lenses for landscape (trees and forest interior scenes) and photographing artwork. The sample photos I've seen look sharp and quite good overall. But I'm considering the 18-140 instead. Which would you think is best? Most of my shots are in the 50-the low hundreds range.



#2
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,589 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

If you don't have 16 mm covered, you *will* end up in a situation where you can't step back to compose the scene with the 18 mm focal length. At least, that has been my experience.

 

Is the artwork flat or three-dimensional? Both the 16-50 and the 50-250 render 3-D objects beautifully when properly lit, I am not so sure about the 18-140. I should add that I haven't owned an 18-140, so my experience is with borrowed lenses. If it is more of a repro situation, the 16-50 does a passable job with software that has a profile for the lens. If it is flat field you are after, the Z 50 macro is at least equal to the old 55 mm micronikkors that were the go-to lenses for macro in their day. I am not sure how the 18-140 handles flat-field and distorsion as I haven't used them enough.



#3
bluzman

bluzman

    Forum Veteran

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 665 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationNorth Texas

I'm thinking of buying a z50 with the 16-50 and 50-250 kit lenses for landscape (trees and forest interior scenes) and photographing artwork. The sample photos I've seen look sharp and quite good overall. But I'm considering the 18-140 instead. Which would you think is best? Most of my shots are in the 50-the low hundreds range.

You also might want to consider the full frame Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/4 S. They're available used, which is how I got mine, for an affordable price.

 

I have the kit lenses and am quite pleased with how they perform but at the time I got my Z50, the 18-140 didn't exist and I wanted a good walking around lens. The 24-70 on the Z50 gives a FOV corresponding to 36-105mm which fit my needs nicely. The only caveat is that it doesn't have VR like the native Z DX lenses but judicious shutter speed selection can take care of that.