Jump to content

Welcome to NikonForums.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Your best photo of the week ending September 4 2021


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,634 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

Sometime before midnight (whatever time zone you are in) this Sunday, September 4 2022, post the best photo you have taken this week.
Any subject, any style and any equipment—just give us your best shot.
If you can, list your EXIF info and any special lighting setups you may have used.



#2
g4aaw pete

g4aaw pete

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,800 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationBirchington, North Kent Coast.

Site Supporter

LjQ6wRM.jpg

 

D800E

AF-s 24-85@ 42mm

1/1000

f8

ISO 400



#3
Dogbytes

Dogbytes

    Forum Veteran

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 817 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationCornwall

C8B8D45A-23EC-41DC-A42B-C0FD65B4EA3F.jpeg

 

Tinka

iPhone SE3

Too far away and cropped too much!

28mm f/1.8

1/172sec

iso40

 



#4
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,634 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

My best work this week is a set of three monochromes meant to be framed together as a triptych.

They are all shot on a bridge that spans the Fyris river, the viewpoints are within a meter from each other.

Shot with the Leica D-Lux 7 and processed with Silver Efex PRO. The landscape with a yellow filter emulation and the other two with a blue one. The film emulation is Panatomic X for all three.

 

gallery_1251_784_315365.jpg

Lens (mm): 15.9 (35 mm equivalent)
ISO: 200
Aperture: 5.6
Shutter: 1/1000
Exp. Comp.: -0.3

 

gallery_1251_784_336342.jpg

Lens (mm): 34 (75 mm equivalent)
ISO: 200
Aperture: 2.8
Shutter: 1/1300
Exp. Comp.: 0.0

 

gallery_1251_784_308996.jpg

Lens (mm): 34 (75 mm equivalent)
ISO: 200
Aperture: 2.8
Shutter: 1/800
Exp. Comp.: 0.0



#5
krag96

krag96

    Nikonian

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,319 posts
  • Country Flag

Site Supporter

Great to see you back, Dogbytes!



#6
Ron

Ron

    Nikonian

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,261 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationMagic City

 

Tinka

iPhone SE3

Too far away and cropped too much!

28mm f/1.8

1/172sec

iso40

 

 

How do you like the SE3? I'm still using my original SE, although with a new battery which makes it almost seem like a new phone. But I know I'm going to have to replace it soon, and I'm not real crazy about big phones, so I'm considering an SE3. I also prefer touch ID to face ID because... well, face ID just seems creepy to me. LOL.

 

--Ron



#7
krag96

krag96

    Nikonian

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,319 posts
  • Country Flag

Site Supporter

Flower box on my shooting table

 

Nikon D700  Nikkor 50mm f1.8 pre-D

 

1/30 f9  M 400

 

zYtjAWHh.jpg



#8
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,634 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

Flower box on my shooting table

 

Nikon D700  Nikkor 50mm f1.8 pre-D

 

1/30 f9  M 400

 

zYtjAWHh.jpg

Nice photo, but I wonder if you aren’t a bit past the diffraction threshold. I avoid closing the aperture down more than f/7.1 and prefer f/6.3 or wider open unless I want something of a soft-focus effect or diffraction stars on my D version that is optically identical to your lens. 



#9
krag96

krag96

    Nikonian

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,319 posts
  • Country Flag

Site Supporter

Nice photo, but I wonder if you aren’t a bit past the diffraction threshold. I avoid closing the aperture down more than f/7.1 and prefer f/6.3 or wider open unless I want something of a soft-focus effect or diffraction stars on my D version that is optically identical to your lens. 

I would refer to the apeture that gives the sharpest photos a sweet spot rather than a threshold simply because diffraction is going to happen at any apeture, it's just a law of physics.  True, the smaller apeture, the more diffraction by law of physics.  But no, I haven't taken the time to find the ''sweet spot'' with this lens and you're right, it's probably closer to f6.3 than f9. Lets enlarge it and take a closer look.  It won't let me, I''l have to do a crop.

 

6AAtiqlh.jpg



#10
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,634 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

The sweet spot occurs even earlier, more like f/4.5 or so. What I mean with threshold is the degree of diffraction where the low-pass filter on the sensor starts interacting with the natural filtering of the lens, making the loss of acuity much more prominent. The strong OLPF in the D700 makes this occur earlier



#11
Dogbytes

Dogbytes

    Forum Veteran

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 817 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationCornwall

How do you like the SE3? I'm still using my original SE, although with a new battery which makes it almost seem like a new phone. But I know I'm going to have to replace it soon, and I'm not real crazy about big phones, so I'm considering an SE3. I also prefer touch ID to face ID because... well, face ID just seems creepy to me. LOL.

 

--Ron

It’s a good phone and I’d happily recommend it. I had an iPhone 8 for the previous three years, so the SE3 is very familiar in terms of size, screen, etc. All the tech specs and reviews say it has the same camera as the iPhone 8 and it may well do, for all I know, but it certainly works better. Could be firmware or the much better processor but the camera has a few new tricks (Portrait mode, etc.) and it is far better at not blowing out highlights. 
In truth, I’d rather have had an iPhone 13 Mini but they’re too expensive for me. I’m very pleased with the SE3.



#12
bluzman

bluzman

    Forum Veteran

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 665 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationNorth Texas

2022-09-04 14:04:34

D500, Nikon AF-P FX 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E ED VR
1/1000 sec, f/20, ISO 2500, 0 EV, 300 mm (35mm equivalent: 450 mm)
 

Y3S6dHIh.jpg



#13
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,634 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

2022-09-04 14:04:34

D500, Nikon AF-P FX 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E ED VR
1/1000 sec, f/20, ISO 2500, 0 EV, 300 mm (35mm equivalent: 450 mm)
 

Y3S6dHIh.jpg

What kind of whirly-bird is this? Hughes 369 or something completely different?



#14
Ron

Ron

    Nikonian

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,261 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationMagic City

It’s a good phone and I’d happily recommend it. I had an iPhone 8 for the previous three years, so the SE3 is very familiar in terms of size, screen, etc. All the tech specs and reviews say it has the same camera as the iPhone 8 and it may well do, for all I know, but it certainly works better. Could be firmware or the much better processor but the camera has a few new tricks (Portrait mode, etc.) and it is far better at not blowing out highlights. 
In truth, I’d rather have had an iPhone 13 Mini but they’re too expensive for me. I’m very pleased with the SE3.

Okay, thanks... that's what I was hoping to read. I too would prefer an iPhone 13 Mini but, as you said, they aren't cheap.

 

--Ron



#15
bluzman

bluzman

    Forum Veteran

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 665 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationNorth Texas

What kind of whirly-bird is this? Hughes 369 or something completely different?

I'm clueless when it comes to anything that isn't a US Navy helo.



#16
Dogbytes

Dogbytes

    Forum Veteran

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 817 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationCornwall

What kind of whirly-bird is this? Hughes 369 or something completely different?

Looks like a Hughes 500C. The modern equivalent is the MD500 series. Very nice little single gas turbine helicopter. A friend of mine had one very similar, back in the 90s and I also got to ride on a 160th SOAR Little Bird, which, at the time, was a highly modified MD500D. If I can find a pic, I’ll post it. 
 



#17
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,634 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

The registration says it is a 369HS, which is a 500C. I tend to think of Hughes helicopters using the chassis codes as they were sold under different names in different markets. This means that we are both right in our guesses.

#18
fallout666

fallout666

    Nikonian

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,098 posts
  • Country Flag
  • Locationcfl area of space coast

tested out nikon Z 28-75mm at volleyball game in poor lighting gym and did great but people made little bit of challenge. 

 

nikon Z6 Z 28-75mm at 75mm F/2.8 1/1600 ISO 4000 did edit in lightroom to crop and pop enjoy 

Attached Thumbnails

  • 301676754_10221184843920381_165087811975303306_n.jpg