Jump to content

Welcome to NikonForums.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Looking for a FX walkaround zoom


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1
nono

nono

    Junior Member

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts
  • Country Flag
Hi,

I bought a used D700 a couple of months ago, and I'm thinking about getting a few lenses for it. I currently have a 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8 (both AFD) and I will soon get a Tokina 80-400 (scored on ebay, not yet in my hands). I'm looking for a walkaround zoom with more and less these requirements:

* 24-something,
* f/4 is enough, no need for going 24-70 f/2.8,
* good enough IQ of course,
* VR would be nice but not required,
* reasonably future-proof (I may upgrade to a D8x0 or a Z at some point),
* preferably 500 euros or less (buying used is OK).

I gather the 24-85 f/2.8-4 is quite good for the price, even though it won't autofocus on a Z if I'm not mistaken? I also know there are a few 24-105 or 24-120 models around, but I don't know which are good and which are not.

Thanks for your advice!

#2
TBonz

TBonz

    Sportz Guy

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,652 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationOn A Field Somewhere...

Site Supporter

You can't beat the 24-70 but I liked the range of the 24-120.  I needed more than the f4 so I went to the 24-70 but I really enjoyed having that lens when I didn't need the f2.8.  It was a great all purpose lens.

 

Since I normally have my 70-200 on a different body, I didn't have much of an issue covering the high end of the range.  The 24-70 is quicker focusing, but both the VR and non-VR models are heavier than the 24-120.



#3
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,634 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

The 24-85 is a better match on a D6x0 or D750 than on the D700 as it is so light. The Sigma 24-105 is a nice choice if on a budget. The current Nikon 24-120 is a very nice walk-around zoom, the older versions were not.



#4
nono

nono

    Junior Member

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts
  • Country Flag

You can't beat the 24-70 but I liked the range of the 24-120.  I needed more than the f4 so I went to the 24-70 but I really enjoyed having that lens when I didn't need the f2.8.  It was a great all purpose lens.
 
Since I normally have my 70-200 on a different body, I didn't have much of an issue covering the high end of the range.  The 24-70 is quicker focusing, but both the VR and non-VR models are heavier than the 24-120.

Thanks. I guess I should elaborate on this: I already own a Pentax K-1 with a Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 and I would like to complement this kit rather than duplicate it. Pentax doesn't have anything 24-100-ish, the only current lens in this kind of range is a 28-105 and I'm afraid 28 would be too long. On the other hand, I have this D700 for which lenses are available in this range, so I can as well use it. Hence the 24-105 or 24-120, or maybe 24-85.

The 24-85 is a better match on a D6x0 or D750 than on the D700 as it is so light. The Sigma 24-105 is a nice choice if on a budget. The current Nikon 24-120 is a very nice walk-around zoom, the older versions were not.

Thank you. I will have a look at the Sigma, the Nikon looks a tad too expensive for me.

What about the current 24-85? Is it any good?

#5
Merco_61

Merco_61

    Nikonian

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,634 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationUppsala, Sweden

Site Supporter

It has some CA and there is a bit of sharpness falloff towards the edges. IMO, the balance just doesn't feel right on the D700 and I would rather have the Sigma.



#6
fallout666

fallout666

    Nikonian

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,098 posts
  • Country Flag
  • Locationcfl area of space coast

all depends on reach you need. you have few choice 24-70mm is great choice. but do not get long end. if can take 2 lenses 24-70mm and 70-200mm but 70-200mm is long lens. to me what other said are great ideas too. 



#7
walt@wblady.com

walt@wblady.com

    Active Member

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 76 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationOshawa, Ontario

I'm certainly not a professional photographer, and maybe I don't know what I'm talking about but, I have a lens that I call my... "I have no idea what the heck I'm going to shoot today" walk-around lens. It's my 28-300mm f:3.5-5.6 workhorse. I put it on my D850 or my Z 7 (with an FTZ adapter) when I want to pack one camera with one lens. I've used this glass for just about everything. I know its limitations so I'm never really disappointed in the results. I've also got a S24-70mm f:28, a 70-200mm f:28 and a few other assorted macros and wide angle glass, but I always seem to take this one with me instead of lugging a heavy bag. Haven't been disappointed yet..



#8
bluzman

bluzman

    Forum Veteran

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 665 posts
  • Country Flag
  • LocationNorth Texas

I'm certainly not a professional photographer, and maybe I don't know what I'm talking about but, I have a lens that I call my... "I have no idea what the heck I'm going to shoot today" walk-around lens. It's my 28-300mm f:3.5-5.6 workhorse. I put it on my D850 or my Z 7 (with an FTZ adapter) when I want to pack one camera with one lens. I've used this glass for just about everything. I know its limitations so I'm never really disappointed in the results. I've also got a S24-70mm f:28, a 70-200mm f:28 and a few other assorted macros and wide angle glass, but I always seem to take this one with me instead of lugging a heavy bag. Haven't been disappointed yet..

I can identify with your post. My AF-S DX 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6 has been that lens for me. It seems to always be attached to my D5600. Recently, I acquired a Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Contemporary that I hope will be its counterpart on my D7500.