I own predominately Nikon cameras yet I love the experience of shooting with quirky and different-to-me kinds of equipment such as the Sony QX1 and my F-mount Petzval lens. When Hasselblad announced the X1D I remember gleaning through the specs, marketing and perspectives third party sources were dishing out. Intrigued by a camera with a unique shooting experience through its form factor and immediate touch screen controls. Then the camera was released, although it wasn't a bust, it really wasn't what I expected. I remembered after Hasselblad announced their budget medium format, so did Fuji Film three months later and I started to look into the GFX 50S - the problem is not much was covered on that camera at the time of release. It cost some $2500 less than the X1D and back in September of last year Fuji Film announced the GFX 50R and GFX 100. Do you think these will impact the market as both brands are pushing the megapixel game with yet to be released 100 megapixel cameras?
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
'Affordable Medium Format' - Fuji Film and Hasselblad
#1
Posted 24 February 2019 - 01:29 PM
#2
Posted 24 February 2019 - 03:31 PM
Medium format is a much smaller market than DSLR. I played around with a Mamiya 645J that I picked up at a pawn shop way back in the film days. I wasn't patience enough to really learn how to use it properly and ended up selling it after a few months.
- TheGlobalCitizen likes this
#3
Posted 24 February 2019 - 04:09 PM
#4
Posted 24 February 2019 - 07:22 PM
Affordable?
Then, not the Trichromatic XF iQ4!
That's why the topic reads 'Affordable Medium Format,' in a way to say it isn't priced like a Fuji Film X-T3 but nor are these in the realm of a Hasselblad H6D or PhaseOne XF systems.
#5
Posted 25 February 2019 - 01:09 AM
Medium format is a much smaller market than DSLR. I played around with a Mamiya 645J that I picked up at a pawn shop way back in the film days. I wasn't patience enough to really learn how to use it properly and ended up selling it after a few months.
What would say made it so different that you weren't willing to spend the time to get to know it?
#6
Posted 25 February 2019 - 12:51 PM
- TheGlobalCitizen likes this
#7
Posted 25 February 2019 - 01:11 PM
The 645J back was awful. Difficult to load and easy to get things wrong. Instead of interchangeable film backs, it had a quite flimsy film insert. The Pentax and Bronica 6x4.5 cameras were much more userfriendly, even if they didn't have interchangeable backs either if I remember correctly.
- Fletch and TheGlobalCitizen like this
#8
Posted 25 February 2019 - 05:57 PM
How do you feel about the future of digital medium format? It seems like although the files are digital, shooting with them still seem slow.
#9
Posted 25 February 2019 - 06:08 PM
I've thought about renting one just to try it out for the panoramas that I like to do and see if it is worth looking in to buying. As to the future, I believe there will be a small market for them in the advertising industry as they need the larger format for their billboards. The newer High MP DSLR cameras can match the MP quality but you can only stretch a photo so far.
- TheGlobalCitizen likes this
#10
Posted 26 February 2019 - 08:47 AM
IMO the crop medium format systems offer too little advantage over the high-res FX 35 mm sensors. The full 645 sensor cameras are still too expensive.
The slow operation can be an advantage as seen with the Rollei SL66 and the Mamiya RZ in the analog days. Slow and deliberate is not a disadvantage in a studio or landscape setting as the results usually are better, which lets you charge more for your work.
- TheGlobalCitizen likes this
#11
Posted 28 February 2019 - 11:02 PM
I've thought about renting one just to try it out for the panoramas that I like to do and see if it is worth looking in to buying. As to the future, I believe there will be a small market for them in the advertising industry as they need the larger format for their billboards. The newer High MP DSLR cameras can match the MP quality but you can only stretch a photo so far.
I am looking at renting a GFX sometime soon just to see what it is like in person too. Can't knock on it until you try it.
As for high megapixel full frame DSLR cameras, you're right, they are fantastic but those images can be taken so far. That's what prompted me to start this topic.
IMO the crop medium format systems offer too little advantage over the high-res FX 35 mm sensors. The full 645 sensor cameras are still too expensive.
The slow operation can be an advantage as seen with the Rollei SL66 and the Mamiya RZ in the analog days. Slow and deliberate is not a disadvantage in a studio or landscape setting as the results usually are better, which lets you charge more for your work.
The advantages of the cameras like the Fuji GFX 50S and 50R seem so minor in comparisons to the likes of the D850/Z7 and A7RIII, yet the format for me is so intriguing. Maybe because it seems like it is in its infancy where I wonder what are the theoretical limits of the 35mm sensors are. I am sure engineers will be able to extract more megapixels but at what cost?
#12
Posted 02 March 2019 - 11:16 PM
Inside look from the CP+ show!
CP+ 2019: Hands-on with the high-res, high-performance flagship Fujifilm GFX 100