I want to buy a 70-300mm but which one
70-300mm AF-P DX a non VR version or the 70-300mm AF-S
Which one is better, and does VR on that long lens matter.
Please help
I want to buy a 70-300mm but which one
70-300mm AF-P DX a non VR version or the 70-300mm AF-S
Which one is better, and does VR on that long lens matter.
Please help
VR is definitely a boon on these. The old AF-S has much better contrast at the long end and is completely free from vignetting on DX as it has a larger image circle. Whether it is worth the price premium is another matter... Another advantage of the AF-S is that it has switches instead of being controlled by software. This makes it much faster to work with when you need to change VR modes during shooting.
I did not know that. Yeah, but i was also thinking about maybe 18-200mm or 55-200, what do you think of them, 70-300 af-s is a bit more expensive.
what would you recommend for me, i have a 50mm, up to 150$, 18-200 or something else?
As you have no zoom lenses and a limited budget, why not go for the kit duo? 18-55 and 55-200 give better results than the 18-200 and are often sold off as people see them as junk lenses, which they definitely aren't. I don't know what prices are like where you live, but sometimes a Tamron 17-50/2.8 and a Tamron 70-300 can be found near the $150 mark together.
I was thinking a 18-200 cause that a bit wider angel, but i just found a 55-200mm VRII for 150$. Which one to choose?
Yeah i will try. I just want to be fast and sharp lens, so it is better than 18-200mm.
And how it is perform on landscape photography, i know that is not that wide but still, will photos be sharp?
As Peter recommended, the 18-55 and 55-200 combination will be much better than the 18-200. If it were me I would go with the two lenses, even if I had to buy one now and one later.
I have a chance to buy a 18-55mm VR II a new version, so how it performs, is it sharp and fast, is gonna perform good on my D7000. And is it to much to pay for it, it is 125$?
As you have a 50, in what direction don't you think that works? Do you want a wider or narrower field of view as your first zoom? If the answer is that you often have to take a step(or several) back and still don't get what you want in the frame, start with the 18-55. If you find that you very often need to crop to just show your subject, start with the 55-200. Only you can answer these questions as we all see differently.
The latest version (AF-P full frame) is by far the sharpest. It's even sharp at the 300mm setting. All previous versions are soft at the long end.
|
Photo Sharing →
Post Your Photos →
Nature and Animals →
Juvenile Herring GullStarted by La Bikina, 15 Mar 2024 gull, bird, nikon, nikkor, nature and 1 more... |
|
||
Camera and Photo Help →
Beginner Questions →
Help me understand lenses pleaseStarted by timbow, 03 Mar 2024 lenses, nikon, d5600 |
|
|||
Camera and Photo Help →
Beginner Questions →
New to Photography and my Nikon 5600Started by timbow, 18 Feb 2024 nikon, d5600, beginner |
|
|||
Lenses and Accessories →
Nikon Lens Discussion →
NIKON MEDICAL-NIKKOR Auto 1:5,6 f=200mmStarted by La Bikina, 09 Feb 2024 medical, nikon, lens, 200mm and 1 more... |
|
|||
Photo Sharing →
Post Your Photos →
Abstract and Artistic Effects →
Fake 3D effectStarted by La Bikina, 02 Jan 2024 streetart, sticker, flyer, nikon and 4 more... |
|